🎙️ podcast Analysis March 25, 2026 RiskReversal Pod

Software Sector: AI Model Improvement Creates Consumption-Based Pricing Disruption

Cybersecurity Vertical Software
Tickers
2 Picks
Conviction HIGH
Risk Profile 1.4/10 (LOW RISK)
Horizon 12-24 months
Signal Snapshot Core Theme: Software Sector

Software stocks oversold on AI disruption fears

Enterprise spending shifting to private AI companies

Enterprise budget cycles; AI threat escalation

Executive Summary

Notable Capital's Jeff Richards identifies a fundamental disruption in enterprise software where consumption-based AI models are cannibalizing traditional SaaS pricing. Richards cites a portfolio company switching from Salesforce plus ancillary tools costing $15,000 per rep annually to a native AI solution at $3,000 per rep. The IGV software ETF added $60 billion in revenue in 2025, with $30 billion going to Microsoft alone, while private AI companies captured $25 billion in net new revenue growth from $8 billion to $35 billion. This year, private AI companies will likely add $50-75 billion versus $60 billion for legacy software, creating a slope advantage for consumption-based models. Richards argues every software company must answer whether their product improves as AI models improve, creating the classic innovator's dilemma where incumbents cannot compete on price without cannibalizing existing business. He identifies cybersecurity (Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike) and vertical software companies with integrated payments as the only defensible public software categories. Cybersecurity benefits from increasing AI-driven threats requiring higher enterprise spending, while vertical software serves customers without IT teams who are less likely to build internal AI solutions quickly.

Key Insights

01 Key Insight
Enterprise IT spending is shifting from fixed contracts to consumption-based AI models at dramatically lower price points
what Jeff Richards said

“It was costing them about $15,000 per rep per year. They switched to one of these new Native AI companies. It basically gives them that whole stack on a consumption basis for about $3,000 a year.”

Investment Implication Traditional SaaS companies face pricing cannibalization as AI-native competitors offer 70-80% cost savings through consumption models

This is a preview. Log in to see the full analysis including investment opportunities, risks, catalysts, and detailed insights.


Next:
The Scale Paradox: When Billion-Dollar Funds Outperform Their Smaller Siblings →

A16Z's $1 billion growth fund has become their best-performing fund in firm history, with Databricks returning 7X and…

Investment Disclaimer: StackAlpha provides information and analysis tools for educational purposes only. Nothing on this platform constitutes investment advice, and you should not rely solely on this information for investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always consult with qualified financial advisors before making investment decisions. Full Disclaimer